Self-Storage Facility Security Levels: Good vs Better vs Best

As tenant expectations have changed and security models continue to evolve, owners and operators find themselves reexamining their own access control and security models to see if they are still aligned with best practices. Where does your facility security level stand—Good, Better, or Best?

What is Good?

Decades ago, self-storage facilities were simple: large buildings subdivided into individual units, often secured with padlocks. Over time, tenants demanded more security, leading to the introduction of fences that enclosed the facility, creating specific entry and exit points. These facilities also implemented gates controlled by keypads or gate controllers, allowing access to those with assigned codes. While this setup is still considered good for controlling property access, it has limitations. For instance, it doesn't monitor if someone stays on the property longer than usual.

What is Better?

To elevate security, some facilities have adopted additional technologies. These include door alarms for individual units and cameras around the property to capture images or videos of tenants. These measures enhance security but don't fully address issues like after-hours presence or immediate notification of break-ins, especially when the site is unmanned. Adding keypads for both entry and exit helps track who is on the property, but the system's reliance on codes can be a weakness, as codes can be stolen or shared.

What is Best?

Most break-ins and thefts occur after hours when no one is on the property. This is a significant blind spot for many self-storage facilities. Enhanced after-hours security is crucial, especially in densely populated or high-crime areas. The most secure facilities use advanced measures like tamper-resistant Bluetooth latches, such as PTI’s PROEDGE, which notify tenants or operators immediately if a unit is accessed improperly. Because these latches are paired with a tenant’s smart devices, the risk of unauthorized access through stolen codes is eliminated. Adding motion detectors in units provides another layer of security, offering immediate notifications of unauthorized presence.

For facilities looking to elevate their perimeter access control security, the AP1 system offers onboard Bluetooth capabilities, allowing operators to minimize or eliminate keypads. In fact, more facilities are adopting a hybrid access control approach, employing keypads during manned hours and Bluetooth-only access after hours. This ensures that only specific device owners can access the site, significantly enhancing security. The AP1 can also alarm when doors are held open or when motion is detected in restricted areas, further boosting security and access control.

Key Takeaways

Ask yourself: What type of facility do you have? Is it good, better, or the best? Evaluate your current security measures and consider if they are adequate or if there are exploitable weaknesses. Are your tenants demanding increased security? Could investing in additional security justify higher rates or more rented units?

Moving from good to better or better to best doesn't have to be cost-prohibitive. In fact, as tenants increasingly demand greater security and flexibility, enhancing your facility's security is becoming more of a necessity. Security is expected, but how secure is your facility?